UF - Institutional Review Boards

Links to our IRB websites:
IRB Home
Link to IRB-01 Gainesville Health Science Center
Link to IRB-02 UF Campus/Non-Medical
Link to IRB-03 Jacksonville Health Science Center
Link to IRB-04 Western IRB (WIRB)
 
General IRB policies
 

 
Other Links
Grant Review
Glossary of IRB Terms
Training Home
Newsletter Archives
Tracking for Paper Studies
Access for research staff
Tracking System Help
 

IRB Review of Grant Applications

The University of Florida IRBs are currently requesting that copies of federal grant applications be submitted with IRB protocols. The following questions and answers are provided to explain this requirement.

1. Why is the IRB requiring that a copy of the grant be submitted?

Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) regulations at 45 CFR 46.103(f) require that each application or proposal for HHS-supported human subject research be reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board. The University of Florida is obliged, therefore, to review these proposals.

2. What portion of the grant must be submitted?

Investigators must submit a copy of the entire proposal (exclusive of apendices). If a grant is linked to multiple IRB protocols then the IRB needs to know which protocols so that they can all be reviewed. Only one copy of the grant proposal is required in the IRB office. The IRB cannot review a protocol unless the entire grant application has been submitted.

3. What exactly is the IRB looking for?

The grant proposal must be found to be consistent with information related to the protection of human subjects. Examples include information about (i) the number and qualifications of collaborating investigators and other members of the research team; (ii) cooperating institutions or performance sites that may require separate or additional IRB review or an Assurance of Compliance; (iii) characteristics of proposed research facilities that may affect subject safety or the confidentiality of data; (iv) the feasibility of financial commitments made to subjects; and (v) the cost of proposed subject protection measures, such as consent monitors or translators.

4. What will happen if the research protocol is found to be inconsistent with the proposal?

The IRB protocol must be consistent with the grant proposal. Any discrepancies will require the PI to either amend the current protocol or to submit a new protocol that is consistent with the grant application. If the IRB and PI are unable to reconcile these differences then the Division of Sponsored Research will freeze any funds in the account until the IRB determines that the application and protocol are consistent.

 


 
University of Florida
© Univeristy of Florida
Last updated 05/18/2012 3:57 PM